The individual from the 1989 crime scene is the victim in the current investigation

You: It seems like the DNA pattern from the 1989 crime scene matches the current victim’s, so could the individual from the 1989 crime scene be the victim in the current investigation?

Eric: That would suggest the same person is connected, meaning the 1989 individual and the current victim are the same.

Dr. Greene: It's good to explore possibilities, but let's take a closer look at what the RFLP results are actually telling us. Are the patterns from the victim and the 1989 crime scene identical? They seem quite different to me. For example, look at the largest bands at the top of the gel from the crime scene. Those are missing from the victim’s pattern.

You: I see what you mean, Dr. Greene.

Dr. Greene: Let's reevaluate what the RFLP patterns suggest.

 

Modified from https://youtu.be/n2bVFcJP-HY 

  • There is no connection between the current case and the one from 1989
  • No conclusions can be drawn from the results
  • There is a potential connection between the current case and the one from 1989

Map: CS9 - RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE DIGESTION OF DNA (1018)
Node: 19345
Score:

reset

OpenLabyrinth
OpenLabyrinth is an open source educational pathway system

Review your pathway

  • The individual from the 1989 crime scene is the victim in the current investigation

Reminder

empty_reminder_msg

FINISH

Time is up